please, use some common sense. When constructing your argument have you even considered the precedent that has been set in place since the beginning of these forums? Have you even considered the fact that A) All the pictures in this forum are of the poster or of someone/some animal that shares an immediate relationship with the poster and B) The picture is "real?" Btw, the "someone not me" rule was specifically made to address photo thieves that steal images of "real" people off picture services like Rateme.
The question of adding in a blurb addressing the putting up images of mosaics or of digitally created images that share no personal relation to the poster has never crossed our minds. This is because, frankly, we thought that the poster would be smart enough to realize that connection and put those types of images where they belong: the other pictures forum.
Again, if you desire to press point, i suggest you bring this up with Jusun.
The criteria for JUDGING is loose. However, the criteria for posting and entering must follow the goals and aims of this forum and of the contest.
__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal
"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)
|