|
Thank you for pointing out my error, however everything else you have said since my last post is wrong.
quote:
I'm not sure whether you left out a space or a verb, but either way you prove my point
quote:
u should noe its "im careless"
In other words, it was missing a verb. I am fairly certain you mean "im" as a contraction of "I am"; am being the missing verb.
quote:
y the fuck are u here for to correct everyone in this forum?
No, I am here to insult you. I am not a regular of this forum, but my friend asked me to rip into you.
quote:
stupid adj [MF stupide, fr. L stupidus, fr. stupere to be numb, be astonished] (1541) : Given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless manner
quote:
u guys are saying im stupid cause the way i type
If you had been paying attention, you'd know I was calling you stupid because you are given to unintelligent decisions or acts and are acting in an unintelligent or careless manner.
quote:
all of a sudden ur talking about grammar and shit.
Sloppy writing is indicative of sloppy thinking. While grammar is not the issue at hand, your poor diction undermines your own arguments.
quote:
i dont give a fuck about what u say
Then you must have quite a problem with cognitive dissonance. If what you say is true, emotionally, you have no stake in what is said in this forum, yet, your behavior (continually posting rebuttals to said posts) has no relation to such cognition. Either you're in pain, you're a liar, or you're a hypocrite. None are enviable roles.
quote:
im just telling my honest truth of what i think
Back to the issue of honesty again, this is absolutely impossible, because of an internal contradiction present in your argument. In your earlier posts, you claim that your problem with Resident Evil Delta is its deviation from the series. You also claim that Resident Evil 4 will be good, despite its deviation from the series. When this contradiction was pointed out to you, you altered your position to, rather than debasing the merits of the idea, debasing the process which led to the idea, as well as the person who came up with it. As these positions are mutually exclusive as they have been presented, you cannot possibly have been "telling [your] honest truth". Proof:
quote:
ur on crack
quote:
i hatre talking to dumb f*cks
quote:
i just think hes a dumbass for even thinking of it
quote:
ur still a dumbass
quote:
im not trying to talk shit because i hate that person all i did is respond to what he said
As it is impossible for all 5 of these quotes to be true, quod erat demonstrandum.
quote:
i dont type like lil kids in cs
Yes; yes you do.
If you can point out one factual statement (aside from the you/your correction, i already conceded that) you have written on this topic so far, I am sure we will take everything back.
You have my apologies for the lengthy post, but obviously i had some catching up to do.
P.S. In case there is any confusion (and i'm sure the world is confusing enough for you as it is) there are two people who post with the name "WE ARE MANDY". The "nigh-unreadable is correct grammar, you ass" post was the other Mandy (we are both Mandy).
__________________
WE ARE MANDY, WE DEMAND BAGELS!!!
Last edited by WE ARE MANDY on 07-12-2004 at 10:35 PM
|
07-11-2004 01:11 AM
