God, all you do is repeat yourself. I'm answering the same thing again pretty much. I'll capitalize stuff to get the message across with emphasis. Please answer this time. If you don't want to, oh well.
quote: Originally posted by sTiLLcarefOryOu
first, I'm not saying God is putting all those generalization in my head.. of course itz juss me.. im juss saying i think however i like to.. and yea.. i may make generlizationz and think other mean thingz... and wut im trying to say about that is im human.. i do a lot of thingz.. either bad or good.. and think different wayz either good or bad.... and after wut u sed that i was generalizing and stuff.. i guess it wasnt nice.. i never sed it was.. thatz why i did apologize and even changed my post cuz i kno i did the mistake..
haha, fine. It's not liek thats what you explicitly said the first time. "and if u dont like me being perfect.. ask God why he made me this way." You just throw all your responsibility to god. It's such a cop out. And now you revoke it and say that you meant he made you human, therefore you aren't perfect. Your intention might have been to get that across, but it really doesn't come off that way. No i'm not the supreme judge that decides how things come off and what interpretation works, but i'm sure a lot of people would agree with this. And still, that's blaming humanity, not yourself.
Once again, i will repeat this, ALL I SAID ABOUT THE GENERALIZATION WAS ONE ADJECTIVE. I'll quote myself, the only time i ever say anything about it. Where do you come up with this stuff. YOU HAVE NO BASIS FOR YOUR ARGUMENT WHAT SO EVER. You keep talking about me saying stuff about your generalization, but look, here is what i said...the ONLY thing i ever said about it:
" i really don't like this biased thread haha, no offense intended at all. Just saying. Crazy generalizations, that are defended, and such."
Now, what did i say about that which is so bad. I voiced my opinion...i don't like it, i said i didn't like it, and suddenly i'm "in the convo wit you"? I just said that one thing. And look at my next post, it is SO nice, there isnt' anything bad in it. I even called your opinion interesting, and asked if you could elaborate on it becuase i thought it was intriguing. Where could you possibly be coming from? I don't understand at all. You are accusing me of everything i didn't do. When you were the one who in fact started it. As i've shown below. But i'll type it again because you just keep restating yourself over and over again, as if you don't read anything i write.
quote:
and yea.. if u werent offended then ok.. so u made your opinionz.. and i gotta respect otha pplez opinionz too cuz i kno every human think differently.. thatz why i apologized and changed the post agenz~ and i kno i was singling u out.. cuz you're the only one thatz actually in the convo wit me.. cuz everyone else.. they dont care.. [well since they're not saying anything.. im taking they dont care.. evevn if they do they dont wanna bother wit it] cuz after i apologized and wuteverz.. they stopped posting after that except you.. and other ppl after my first post.. i juss disagreed with me.. and they juss sed "thatz a bad generalization and itz prob from your own experience" and stuff.. but it seemed like u were the only one even before the apology that was still making your statementz.. and even after it~~
Wow, thank you thank you thank you. You finally accepted the fact that i wasn't offended.
Again, how am i possibly "in the convo wit [you]" I posted two posts that really weren't attacking at all. I didn't say anything about the generalization pretty much except that one sentece, and you come and accuse me of everything. Well, everyone didn't seem to care because,,.....well, i have an idea, maybe cause they weren't being singled out and being accused of something they never did...oh shit, that happened to me. Maybe that's why i'm not cool with it. Oh wait, i am...but you keep saying i'm not! And your only support is one word! yes, one word! It's the word "seem". Here, i'll show you:
"but it SEEMED like u were the only one even before the apology that was still making your statementz.. and even after it~~" -you
I capitalized the word for you, i know you didn't capitalize it . Anyway, there is the very basis of your entire accusation. It "seemed" that way, and when i say it's not, you still go on about how it "seems" some way or another despite my saying it's not. Furthermore, there isn't any basis for your argument. SHOW ME WHERE I SAY SOMETHING THAT RELATES TO THIS. The only sentence i pasted is the only one i can find. Furthermore, how did it seem like i cared about it so much, when i only posted TWO times, ABOUT MATURITY NOT YOUR GENERALIZATION. answer this point please, i've been saying it constantly, and i don't see the connection AT ALL. If i'm not even talking about it, how do i even come into play here.
The only time i became "in the convo wit [you]" was when you posted that sarcastic remark you are trying to somehow cop out of now. Heeey, that's next on the list of quotes!
quote:
and if u were being sacrcastic so then ok... cuz i was being sarcastic when i sed that .. the [sorry im not perfect like u] thing.. well i guess it didnt sound sarcastic...? cuz yea.. never kno online rah?
the thing is, when i said i was JOKING that works. When you say you're being SARCASTIC, it doesn't. When i said i was being facetious about teh remark when i called you immature, that would mean that i'm saying you either are mature, didn't have a definitive answer (which was the case), and/or didn't mean anything by it at all (case as well). You're putting words in my mouth, i didn't say i was being sarcastic. I said i was joking! there is a big difference. God, "sarcasm is teh characterization of an expression said in a sardonic tone that denotes bitterness and a power or will to cut and sting." There you go. That's from webster.com more or less. NOW, joking is DIFFERENT. Joking means being intended to be taken light-footed, humorously, or in jest. Do you see the difference? They aren't by any means synonymous. But you are treating them as such. So, when you say you are being sarcastic you are agreeign with the way the sentence came off on me. I knew you were sarcastic, and sarcasm is the ideal delivery method of such an insult. By saying you were sarcastic means that i either that you were being sardonic towards some ludicrous interpretation you had of me that i thought i was all perfect. You know you meant it badly, why are you trying to cop out? If you didn't mean it badly, why did you say it. There really isn't ANY other way it can be taken. Sarcastically is the way you meant it, clearly. And that is insulting.
I was never in teh conversation with you, if i was it was polite. SHOW ME ONE PLACE AGAIN where it sounded as if i cared a lot about THAT WHICH I DIDN'T talk about....oh i'm talking about the generalization if you couldn't figure out. it's the thing you keep telling me i'm talking about but i'm not. You know, the one wehre i keep showing you more quotes from my posts, and you just restate youself saying how much it seemed to be like that. The one where you fabricated all of this, antagonizing me. You know the one! I'm not mad right now, though it wouldn't matter if i was hehe, i'm just capitalizing so if you don't read my whole post, like it seems like, you can read the capitals and get a gist of it maybe.
All right, why did i "seem to care" about the generalization afterwards and before? well, the truth is i never did, i still don't. But you keep saying i do. Why did i reply after your apology? Well, i was like "ok wutever", but that last line was not appreciated. And then after my next post you act like your teh victim and accuse me of all this stuff i didn't do. Answer this please. Look back, i was REALLY NICE, and didn't seem to care that much. And you didn't give me the chance to be like "ok wutever", cause you tried to provoke me with that. I'm not mad about that comment, never was. I AM though irritated that you keep on trying to cop out of everything, and act like your the victim, and i'm the bad guy, and accuse me of EVERYTHING I DIDN'T DO. Here, i'll recap again....
2 NICE posts by me, = your sardonic reply = me telling you i didn't appreciate it and telling you to stop victimizing yourself cause you aren't in a position to = you fabricating more things, not elaborating but restating the same thing for like 5 posts in a row telling me you were being sarcastic when i knew you were all along = me and this long reply hoping you'll finally stop copping out.
There in math form. Hope everyone enjoyed this haah, it took some work
quote:
and which sentence?? sorryzz.. im not sure which one you're talking aboutzz.. [and this was not being sarcastic.. im serious.. i forget wut i write.. so im juss askin which ONE sentence u didnt like]
The one preceding this. enjoy.
-edit- PLEASE SHOW ME HOW YOU HAVE ANY BASIS FOR YOUR VICTIMIZATION AT ALL. I don't see it ANYWHERE. Restating for emphasis.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
Last edited by PsychoSnowman on 10-13-2002 at 03:05 AM
|