quote: Originally posted by aznkid1008
well we as the people have abused a rite before like the right to bear arms. its ment and stated for state militia. it never said public or the common man. but not sayin it is rite 2 abuse a rite just givin some more fuel
that's the thing though, you're disproving your own point here. We haven't "abused" any facet of the constitution, we've upheld different interpretations. And, those interpretations are carried through in everyday legality now. The 1st amendment is the same regardless of if you take a strict viewing of the constitution or a loose one, we now interpret it as no govt endorsement or whatever, stricter viewings would be no govt actuated advocacy or anything. Both scenarios uphold the 9th circuit courts decision, the only thing stopping it from fully being carried through is the biggoting people that make it possible to defy legality.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
|